Posted Friday, January 31, 2025
By Beacon Staff
The Edmonds Environmental Council (EEC) reports it has reached an agreement with the City of Edmonds on suspending the EEC’s appeal of City regulations pending results of a scientific study on stormwater infiltration and its risks of PFAS and other toxins polluting the drinking water aquifer.
According to the settlement agreement, the City will use the study results to make recommendations to the Edmonds City Council on the Deer Creek Aquifer Critical Area Regulations.
The full text of the settlement agreement is available on the EEC website.
In a news release from the EEC, it says in July 2024 it appealed the City’s Deer Creek regulations because they allowed the use of shallow underground injection (UIC) wells without considering the risks of PFAS and other so-called “forever chemicals” in stormwater contaminating the drinking water in the Deer Creek Aquifer, and thus risking human health impacts to the residents of southern Edmonds, Woodway, and Esperance.
The EEC includes Edmonds and Woodway citizens, including Joe Scordino, president, and former Edmonds City Councilmember Diane Buckshnis. Other board members are Woodway Councilmember John Brock and community activists Clinton Wright, Dianna Maish, and Ken Reidy.
The Beacon has requested comment from the City.
The appeal requesting the regulations be overturned was filed with the state’s Growth Management Hearings Board.
The EEC appealed the City’s regulation based on state law that requires cities to protect the functions and values of critical areas, including drinking water aquifers.
This municipal responsibility cannot be deferred to a drinking water purveyor (i.e., Olympic View Water District) especially if it is after the drinking water aquifer has become contaminated, the EEC states.
State law defines the City’s responsibility for “protection of critical areas” as “preservation of the functions and values of the natural environment, or to safeguard the public from hazards to health and safety.”
Emphasizing health
The EEC said it wants to emphasize the word “health” in this definition, as it says the risks to human health from the City allowing potential PFAS contamination of a drinking water aquifer was ignored, as evidenced by the lack of any mention of PFAS risks in the City’s environmental review documents for the Critical Area Ordinance.
This was contrary to the best available science and threatened the health of residents of Woodway, as well as southern Edmonds and Esperance, according to the EEC.
In October 2024, the City and the EEC began mediated settlement discussions followed by three months of negotiations by respective attorneys, resulting in a final draft settlement agreement approved by the City Council in an executive session – closed to the public and media – on Jan. 14.
The City Council made changes that were approved by the EEC, and the final settlement agreement was signed by all parties to the appeal.
Amicable approach
The EEC said it entered into settlement discussions because it wanted to take an amicable approach with the City to save on legal costs for both sides in dealing with the issue of PFAS in stormwater and their impacts to human health.
The EEC conceded many of its settlement objectives during the negotiations, such as its request that the City implement an interim ordinance banning shallow UIC wells.
The EEC did this, it says, to reach an agreement on the need for an actual scientific study on PFAS in stormwater and the risks of forever chemicals contaminating the drinking water in the Deer Creek Aquifer and jeopardizing human health.
The settlement agreement calls for a study, to be completed by about June 30, on the risks and avoidance of PFAS contamination in the Deer Creek Aquifer to inform the City’s decision on necessary protections of the Deer Creek Aquifer and human health.
The study will include an assessment of options including the identification of known PFAS sources that may enter the groundwater and subsequently the drinking water aquifer, and an evaluation of a prohibition on both deep and shallow infiltration; a prohibition on any stormwater infiltration unless the stormwater is first filtered in a manner designed to remove PFAS; and a prohibition on using known PFAS sources in or near a drinking water aquifer.
City staff are to then use the study results to develop action options for Edmonds City Council consideration within 45 days of receipt of the study. The EEC says it will track the process and provide input to councilmembers.
If the City Council action, within 90 days of the staff report, does not resolve the legal issues raised by the EEC, the Growth Management Hearings Board appeal process will resume.
More information: EdmondsEnvirCouncil@gmail.com